Tweetchat: Weighing the evidence



Our third #ResNetSLT Twitter journal club took place on Wednesday, 30th March, 2016.

It proved to be another lively discussion – thanks to all who joined in, especially those who are very new to Tweetchatting.

The chat was based around this article. Chaired by Joanne Fillingham the chat featured the three paper authors – Hazel Roddam, Sarah Edney and Heulwen Sheldrick.

This paper illustrates the process of reviewing the available evidence base. In this case the clinical population comprises people with Parkinson's Disease (PD) who have swallowing difficulties and was prompted by a genuine real-world clinical dilemma:
  • What is the best case management for my patients?
  • Why does the accepted management seem to be limited to only compensatory approaches when there is at least some published evidence for more active rehabilitation strategies?
You can find the pre-chat information and questions here.

In the Tweetchat we broadened the discussion to consider the processes of undertaking an evidence review, based on Sackett's five-step model of Evidence-Based Practice.

We hope that posting a brief overview of the key themes that came out through our discussions will give the chance for everyone to continue the conversation – you can post your own comments at any time on this blogsite.

The link to the full transcript is here and the key themes included:
  • The challenge of accessing full papers and research publications
  • Skills and confidence needed for critical analysis of published research
  • Recommendations to get help and support through CAHPR Hubs, professional bodies, research-active colleagues and contact with your local university departments
  • Value of journal clubs to discuss papers and strength of the evidence for changing practice
  • Other sources of support (and possible constraints) from organisations and workplace settings.
You can see the detailed analysis of the Tweetchat here.

It was a great conversation with lots of generously shared advice – thanks to everyone who took part.

For those who were listening in, we hope that you found something useful too. We emphasised again that everyone is most welcome to join us - we were very pleased to see that we again had a range of AHP professionals engaging in our chat.

Distance is no barrier – that is the value of our virtual online community and we really hope to continue to hear more voices from across mainland EU in the months ahead.

Please post a comment below to add your own feedback on the chat.

Thanks to Dr Fillingham for chairing the chat, along with Dr Emma Pagnamenta and the International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders for arranging open access to the papers for our Tweetchat journal clubs.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Clinical academic networks

Image
Thank you to Katherine Broomfield ( @KathBroomfield ) for producing the latest ResNetSLT blog post. As a speech and language therapist I accessed networks that were directly related to my clinical area. I joined special interest groups/clinical excellence networks and attended meetings to access shared learning and information which informed my clinical practice. With regards to broader networks, I couldn't really understand how people outside my organisation or specialism would be able to help me within my role as a speech and language therapist. When I started my PhD in April 2017, and living 200 miles away from my University, I realised I would need support that I couldn’t access in my local, rural environment. I started scouting about for sources of support on the internet and I found other clinical academics were discussing their research, clinical interests and wider concerns via social media. I wanted to join in, but I wasn't really sure how to start. I lurked, liked, c
Read more

Tweetchat: The future for EBP – crisis or renaissance?

Image
The inaugural #ResNetSLT Twitter Journal Club took place on Wednesday, 27th January, 2016. It proved to be a great chat and an experience for many new to Tweetchatting with 47 participants, and possibly even a few more just observing. The Tweetchat was based around this article: ' Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? ' To view the chat themes/questions, please click here . The exhilarating dialogue between Dr Joanne Fillingham , who chaired the chat on behalf of Dr Hazel Roddam , and those of us joining in virtually brought evidence-based practice alive and allowed exploration of what EBP really means for us. The conversation covered many themes: challenges and barriers to EBP and research, shared decision making in clinical practice and implication for training and education. There was a call for research based in clinical practice including well-designed case studies and qualitative research as well as using consistent measures to build evidence. Another theme was
Read more

Tweetchat: 'That doesn't translate’ - the role of evidence-based practice in disempowering speech pathologists in acute aphasia management

Image
Our seventh Tweetchat 'That doesn't translate’: the role of evidence-based practice in disempowering speech pathologists in acute aphasia management’ took place on Wednesday 27th July. We were delighted by the reach of the chat, hosted by Dr Hazel Roddam , with 37 participants sending 251 tweets that were delivered to 126,391 linked accounts. Thank you to everyone who contributed and followed the chat. Participants included SLTs from across the UK and in Australia as well as other AHPs. We know that people from other EU countries were also watching the conversation. We were particularly delighted that a number of people joined the Tweetchat for the first time – hope you enjoyed it! The paper reports an exploratory study of speech and language therapists working in Australia with patients who have acute aphasia and it uncovered some startling insights into the direct impact of professionals' values and attitudes on their clinical practice. The SLTs in this study reported fee
Read more